✔ Open editorial meeting #1
Completed by Gisela H.
- Due on
- Assigned to
- Marion H.
- Notes
-
Open editorial meeting, Apr 3, 113.39-14.30. Announced on BC central hub.
Participants: Alenka, Klaus, Marion, Melanie
Docs prepared: publishing time schedule, draft concept, participation according to grant agreement.
Aim of the meeting: Pulling ourselves together ;) and clarify shared directions.- Check and improve docs prepared.
- Pep-Brainstorm on the best possible book.
- Next steps
Comments & Events
Results of apr 3 preliminary editorial meeting. Incorporated in outline for contributers and timeline.
- Aim is to produce a book on transmitting contentious heritages with the arts with is honest! Rather than a promotional exercise. We should totally dismiss an attitude like: oh, we had to do this crappy book because of the Horizon 2020 regulations. No: Lets make a honest book!
- Open editorial process as an opportunity to reflect honestly about and across TRACES. Create an open plattform where this is possible - because it's needed. Using basecamp, but also emails and skype and even f2f (MTM, Review mtg)
- the name of the new basecamp "manual shop floor": a metaphor
- Assure everyone that the open editorial process is about discussion, not just proofreading and admin!
- Hopefully new questions will emerge from the process, better questions which help us think together
- Remember: book has potentially longeviti beyond TRACES funding if its substantial
- Make sure responsibilities are clear. First open participation, at some point consolidation.
- Book as exhibit in the final exhibition ;)?
- Discussion on role of media in heritage field. heritage as spectacle. Interesting: CCP3 press conference (how to make news out of old death masks? "performing heritage?", construct legitimate speaker, critical evaluation, notion of expert)
- brainstorm other titles - seeking traces? finding traces? scouting traces?
Gisela Hagmair completed this to-do.